Friday, November 28, 2008

Adjusting Your Property Taxes to Reflect Declining Values

  • What is Proposition 8? Prop 8 was an early amendment to Prop 13, stating that the only reassessments that can happen at market value occur when there is a change of ownership or a new construction. Until one of these events happens, assessments can only increase by the consumer price index and this can be no more than 2%.

  • Why wasn't my property reduced? Santa Cruz County has a very complex and varied real estate market. Wide spread reductions are very difficult

  • What if I think my assessment is too high? The Assessor has a one page form which may be submitted as a "Request for Reappraisal".

  • When must I file a request for review? A request can be submitted at any time and the Assessor has the authority to reduce the current year's assessment.

  • What happens when the market recovers? ...

To get further answers to all of these questions and more please visit the Santa Cruz County Assessor's Website at http://www.co.santa-cruz.ca.us/tax/prop8pam.htm

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Taxation of Foreclosures and Short Sales

Copyright© 2008, CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® Article Dated 11/12/08

Taxation of Foreclosures and Short Sales

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Introduction

It has been some time since the real estate industry, on a large-scale basis, has had to deal with foreclosures, deeds in lieu of foreclosure, short sales and other distress sales of real property. Unfortunately, distress sales of real property, resulting from a convergence of tightening credit, falling property values, and the consequences of prior lending practices, are all too common currently and do not appear likely to end any time soon.

Seemingly adding insult to injury, owners of real property facing a distress sale, and generally already under financial strain, may be unpleasantly surprised to learn that two types of taxable income can result from a foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, or short sale: capital gains and forgiveness of debt (cancellation of debt) income. Both types of income can trigger unexpected taxes for the owner.

This legal article discusses the income tax consequences to the borrower in the event of foreclosure, the event the borrower simply transfers title to the lender (deed in lieu of foreclosure), and if the borrower sells the property to another in a short sale in which a lender accepts less than the balance due on the loan as payment in full.

Q 1. Are foreclosures, deeds in lieu of foreclosure, and short sales subject to federal tax income taxation?

A Yes. However, the income is taxed differently depending on several factors, including whether there was a foreclosure, a deed in lieu of foreclosure given to the lender, or a short sale (a sale where the lender agrees to reduce the amount owed in order to facilitate a sale), and whether the underlying debt is ?recourse? (the borrower is personally liable for the debt) or ?nonrecourse? (the borrower is not personally liable for the debt).
For federal income taxation as a result of foreclosure, see generally 26 U.S.C. §§ 1001 through 1016. For federal income taxation of short sales, see generally 26 U.S.C. §§ 61, 108 and 1001 through 1016.

TAXATION OF FORECLOSURES OR DEEDS IN LIEU OF FORECLOSURE

Q 2. What is the difference between a foreclosure and a deed in lieu of foreclosure?

A A foreclosure refers either to a trustee's sale foreclosure (not a judicial proceeding) or to a judicial foreclosure (a judicial proceeding). A deed in lieu of foreclosure means that the lender has agreed to accept title to the property and the borrower transfers title to the lender rather than waiting until the lender forecloses on the property. A deed in lieu of foreclosure is not a special instrument. It is simply a conveyance of the property to the lender by grant deed or quitclaim deed; and, in exchange, the lender cancels the promissory note secured by the real property. In this way the lender can avoid the foreclosure process to regain title to the property.

However, a borrower cannot simply transfer title to the lender without the lender's permission. Because some lenders have refused to negotiate and accept the deed in lieu of foreclosure, some creative homeowners have quitclaimed the property to the lender anyway, and have recorded the instrument without the lender's permission.

In 1993, the California legislature passed a statute to protect lenders from involuntary (and invalid) transfers of real property to the lender. The lender must record a "notice of nonacceptance of a recorded deed" in the county where the real property is located. Redelivering a grant of the real property back to the original homeowner (e.g., borrower) does not legally retransfer the title. (Cal. Civ. Code § 1058.5.)

A lender may not want to take a deed in lieu of foreclosure because taking title in this manner does not extinguish any junior liens. A foreclosure by a senior lienholder essentially wipes out all junior liens.

Q 3. How does the owner receive "income" from a foreclosure or a deed in lieu of foreclosure?

A A foreclosure proceeding, whether through a trustee sale or judicial foreclosure, and a deed in lieu of foreclosure given to the lender are treated the same as a sale for income tax purposes. The foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure is reported on the taxpayer's tax return as a sale or exchange in the year the foreclosure is finalized or the deed in lieu of foreclosure is given to the lender.

In a foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure, the owner can receive "capital gain or loss" as in any other sale of real property (i.e., be subject to capital gains taxation or receive a credit for a capital loss). Additionally, the owner can receive "forgiveness of debt" income. This is also referred to as "cancellation of debt" income. Whether the owner is subject to taxation on this income may depend on whether the debt is "recourse" or "nonrecourse." If the debt is a recourse debt, the owner may be deemed to have received taxable income in the amount of debt that is forgiven by the lender (except in certain situations discussed below where the owner will not be taxed). If the debt is nonrecourse debt, there is no taxable income from forgiveness (or cancellation) of debt, but the owner may be still be subject to capital gains taxation.

Q 4. What is "nonrecourse" debt?

A Under California law, a debt is considered "nonrecourse" when a loan is made under either one of the following two circumstances:

(1) When the loan is made to purchase a one-to-four unit property and the borrower intends to occupy at least one of the units, or

(2) When the seller carries back financing for all or a portion of the purchase price of any real property.

(Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 580b.)

In the event of default by the borrower, the lender, or financing seller, is restricted to recovering the property with no right to proceed against the borrower for any deficiency should the property be worth less than the loan amount.

Q 5. What is "recourse" debt?

A Under California law, a "recourse" debt is one in which neither of the two exemptions in Question 4 occurs.

Examples of recourse debt are refinances of existing mortgages, home improvement loans, equity lines of credit, and loans other than seller financing, securing a debt for purchase of property that is not an owner-occupied one-to-four unit property. The lender is not limited to taking the property back and the borrower may be personally liable on the debt. If the lender chooses to foreclose using a trustee's sale, then the lender waives the right to go after the borrower for the deficiency despite the fact that the loan was a recourse debt. In order to go after a deficiency judgment, the lender must go through a judicial foreclosure process.

Q 6. How is the amount realized (taxable income) calculated for a "recourse" debt in a foreclosure?

A If the debt is recourse debt, meaning the owner may be personally liable for the debt, the amount realized is calculated in a two-step approach.

First, you take the difference between the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the property (usually the sales proceeds at the judicial foreclosure or trustee's sale) and the Adjusted Basis in the property. Generally, the Adjusted Basis consists of the purchase price of the property plus any capital improvements (less depreciation, if the property is investment property). This difference is the capital gain or loss. If the FMV exceeds the amount of the Adjusted Basis, then the borrower has realized a capital gain at the time of the transfer (foreclosure). If the Adjusted Basis exceeds the FMV, then the borrower has a capital loss.

Second, you take the difference between the amount of the cancelled debt (e.g., unpaid loan amount) and the sales proceeds at the foreclosure (FMV). This is the forgiveness of debt (cancellation of debt) income and it is treated by the IRS as ordinary income despite the fact that the borrower has received no cash at the time of the foreclosure.

However, if the cancelled debt amount is considered "qualified principal residence indebtedness" pursuant to the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007, there will be no taxation on this forgiveness of debt (cancellation of debt) income. See Question 9 for a definition of "qualified principal residence indebtedness."

RECOURSE DEBT

Example One:

1. The unpaid balance of the loan is $300,000;

2. The FMV of the property is $250,000;

3. The taxpayer's adjusted basis in the property is $200,000.

Assume the lender forecloses and will forgive the underlying debt.

Step one:

FMV ($250,000) less taxpayer?s adjusted basis ($200,000) results in capital gains for the taxpayer.

FMV
$250,000

Less Adjusted Basis
$200,000

Capital Gains
$ 50,000


Step two:

Amount of cancelled debt (amount owed on $300,000 loan) less FMV ($250,000) is ordinary income to the taxpayer.

Amount Owed
$300,000

Less FMV
$250,000

Ordinary Income
$50,000


Note: If a lender chooses to foreclose through a trustee's sale and is barred from obtaining a deficiency judgment by the one action rule under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 580d, it is likely the IRS will still consider that the underlying debt as a recourse debt and it will be subject to debt forgiveness income. (See Rev. Rul. 90-16.) However, there may be no taxation of this income under The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007.

RECOURSE DEBT

Example Two:

If the FMV at the foreclosure sale is more than what the lender is owed, there will be no forgiveness of debt and, thus, no ordinary income to the taxpayer.

1. The unpaid balance of the recourse debt is $300,000;

2. The FMV of the property is $400,000;

3. The taxpayer's adjusted basis in the property is $200,000.

Step one:

FMV ($400,000) less taxpayer's adjusted basis ($200,000) results in capital gains for the taxpayer.

FMV
$400,000

Less Adjusted Basis
$200,000

Capital Gains
$200,000


Step two:

The debt is fully paid (since the FMV of $400,000 exceeds the unpaid loan amount of $300,000) resulting in no forgiveness of debt.

Q 7. How is the amount realized (taxable income) calculated for a "nonrecourse" debt in a foreclosure?

A If the debt is nonrecourse, meaning the owner is not personally liable for any deficiency (beyond the value of the property), the amount realized is the difference between

(a) the greater of: (i) the FMV or (ii) the entire outstanding debt; and

(b) the adjusted basis of the property.

This amount is treated as capital gains and there is no taxation for forgiveness of debt income.

Even though the adjusted basis might exceed the FMV and the outstanding debt, generally no capital loss would be allowed because nearly all nonrecourse debt is associated with a principal residence. (Capital losses are applicable only to investment property.)

NONRECOURSE DEBT

Example:

1. The unpaid balance of the loan is $300,000;

2. The FMV of the property is $250,000;

3. The taxpayer's adjusted basis in the property is $200,000.

Greater of FMV ($250,000) or entire unpaid debt ($300,000) minus taxpayer?s adjusted basis ($200,000) results in capital gains to the taxpayer.

Greater of
FMV ($250,000)
OR
Unpaid Debt ($300,000)

Greater of the above
$300,000

Less Adjusted Basis
$200,000

Capital Gains
$100,000




Q 8. How is a deed in lieu of foreclosure treated for tax purposes?

A A deed in lieu of foreclosure is treated as a sale and taxed just like a foreclosure.
See Questions 6 and 7 above.

TAXATION OF SHORT SALES

Q 9. What are the tax implications of a short sale?

A A short sale, where the lender agrees to reduce some or all of the outstanding debt, may give rise to forgiveness of debt income (also called "cancellation of debt" income). The amount of the debt that the lender agrees to write off is treated as "ordinary income" (as opposed to capital gains income which is taxed at a lower rate). Even though the lender may be taking this action to facilitate the sale by the owner who is under a notice of default and facing a foreclosure, the agreement between the owner and the lender is considered voluntary and the amount of the loan written off by the lender is treated as forgiveness of debt (cancellation of debt). The taxpayer will generally receive a 1099 tax form from the lender in the amount of the cancellation of debt.

This forgiveness or cancellation of debt which is treated as "ordinary income" under certain circumstances may or may not be subject to taxation. Under the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 (H.R. 3648) signed by the President on December 20, 2007, Internal Revenue Code §108(a)(1)(E) was added and provides that a taxpayer will not be taxed upon cancellation of debt income if the following conditions are met:

. The property sold in the short sale is the taxpayer's principal residence, as that term is used in IRC §121.
. The cancellation of debt is Qualified Principal Residence Indebtedness** under IRC Section 163(h)(3)(B).
. The indebtedness is discharged after January 1, 2007 and before January 1, 2013. (The end date was increased by three years from 2010 to 2013 pursuant to H.R. 1424, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008).

**Qualified Principal Residence Indebtedness is a loan secured by the residence used to acquire, construct or substantially improve the residence. The income relief provided is capped at $1,000,000 in the case of a married person filing a separate return and $2,000,000 for all others.

Any reduction of indebtedness excluded by IRC §108(a)(1)(E) will be applied to reduce the basis of the taxpayer's principal residence, but not below zero. This could result in a higher amount of capital gains tax owed by the taxpayer.

Recently passed California law, SB 1055, conforms California Revenue and Tax Code Section 17144.5 to federal law with the following exceptions:

(1) The maximum amount of acquisition indebtedness is reduced to $800,000 for couples filing jointly and $400,000 for individual filers;

(2) The maximum amount of debt relief income that can be forgiven is $250,000 for couples filing jointly and $125,000 for individual filers; and

(3) California’s debt relief statute applies to property sold on or after January 1, 2007 and before January 1, 2009.

Finally, if the owner has owned the property for some time and has refinanced to take out some of the equity, the owner could be subject to capital gains taxation when selling the property as well. For example, the borrower has a remaining loan on the property when the borrower refinances in order to buy an investment property (or to buy a car, to take a vacation, consolidate credit card debt, etc.) and now owes $300,000 to the lender. Thus, the taxpayer's adjusted basis may be lower than the outstanding balance on the loan (see the example below).

The tax calculation would look like step one in calculating a foreclosure sale of recourse debt.

SHORT SALE

Example:

1. The unpaid balance of the loan is $300,000;

2. The sales price (FMV) is $250,000;

3. The taxpayer's adjusted basis in the property is $50,000.

Sales price (FMV $250,000) less taxpayer's adjusted basis ($50,000) results in capital gains for the taxpayer.

Sales Price (FMV)
$250,000

Less Adjusted Basis
$50,000

Capital Gains
$200,000



Additionally, the taxpayer will have ordinary income from the lender's write off of any debt, which in this example would be $50,000 (** See the discussion above in this question to determine whether or not this would be taxable)

Loan Balance
$300,000

Less Sales Price
$250,000

Ordinary Income
$50,000




TAX EXEMPTIONS

Q 10. Are there any other exemptions from the taxation of cancellation of debt income?

A Yes. There are four other circumstances, in addition to what was discussed in Question 9 where the taxpayer can get relief from taxation on cancellation of debt income:

(1) The taxpayer is insolvent (the taxpayer's debts exceed their assets, but the cancellation of debt is forgiven only to the extent of the insolvency);

(2) The debt is discharged as part of a bankruptcy proceeding;

(3) The debt discharged is qualified farm indebtedness; or

(4) The debt discharged is qualified business indebtedness.

For all of the above, any reduction in indebtedness will be applied to reduce the taxpayer’s basis in the property.

(26 U.S.C. §§ 108(a), 108(b), 108(c) and IRS publication 908.)


Note, however, it is likely that many taxpayers currently subject to cancellation of debt income will qualify for the insolvency exemption from taxation. Taxpayers should be advised to speak with their own tax advisors as to whether they meet the insolvency exemption.

Q 11. Are there any exemptions from the capital gains taxation in a foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure or short sale if the property is a principal residence?

A Yes. If the sale, whether through a foreclosure or deed in lieu or short sale, generates capital gains and if the property was the seller's principal residence, the seller may be able to use the capital gains exclusion of $250,000 if single and $500,000 if married filing a joint return. This exclusion does not apply to ordinary income from cancellation of debt.

MISCELLANEOUS

Q 12. Which is better for an owner facing a distress sale: a foreclosure, a deed in lieu of foreclosure or a short sale?

A Any of these situations will impact the owner's credit negatively. Additionally, the owner may have a significantly different tax liability depending on the disposition of the property. Consequently, this is a question that the owner needs to discuss with their own tax advisor.

Q 13. What is a quick summary of these taxation rules?


Recourse Foreclosure/
Deed in Lieu
Nonrecourse Foreclosure/
Deed in Lieu
Short Sale

Capital Gains
FMV Less Adjusted Basis
Greater of FMV or Outstanding Debt Less Adjusted Basis
FMV Less Adjusted Basis

Ordinary Income
Outstanding Debt Less FMV *
No Ordinary Income
Amount of Debt Forgiven*



*No Ordinary Income if "Qualified Principal Residence Indebtedness" (**See the discussion in Question 9)

Q 14. Does California follow the debt relief rules set forth above?

A Recently passed California law, SB 1055, conforms California Revenue and Tax Code Section 17144.5 to federal law with the following exceptions:

1. The maximum amount of acquisition indebtedness is reduced to $800,000 for couples filing jointly and $400,000 for individual filers;

2. The maximum amount of debt relief income that can be forgiven is $250,000 for couples filing jointly and $125,000 for individual filers; and

3. California’s debt relief statute applies to property sold on or after January 1, 2007 and before January 1, 2009.

Q 15. Where can readers obtain more information on the subjects covered above?

A Information is available from a variety of sources, including:

. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (http://www.irs.gov/), which has detailed publications available for free on many tax related subjects.
. The IRS Tele-Tax system, which is an automated voice message information system with recorded information on many commonly asked tax questions. Tele-Tax can be reached by calling 800.829.4477.
. A tax professional, such as a certified public accountant, tax attorney, or enrolled agent.



This legal article is just one of the many legal publications and services offered by C.A.R. to its members. For a complete listing of C.A.R.'s legal products and services, please visit C.A.R. Online at www.car.org.



http://www.car.org/legal/2008articles/taxation-foreclosures-shortsales/

Member Legal Services
Tel 213.739.8282
Fax 213.480.7724
October 9, 2008 (revised)

Copyright© 2008, CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.) Permission is granted to C.A.R. members only to reprint and use this material for non-commercial purposes provided creditis given to the C.A.R. Legal Department. Other reproduction or use is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of the C.A.R. Legal Department. All rights reserved.

Monday, November 03, 2008

13,000 Pieces of Unopened Mail to be Returned to Bonny Doon Residents- Santa Cruz Sentinel Article

By Shanna McCord - Santa Cruz Sentinel Staff Writer

Article Launched: 10/31/2008 08:21:00 AM PDT

BONNY DOON - Roughly 13,000 pieces of mail addressed to Bonny Doon residents were found stashed inside the van of a 78-year-old man who had spent eight years delivering mail in the San Lorenzo Valley, U.S. Postal Service officials said Thursday.
The mail was discovered by Scotts Valley police who came across the parked van last week. When they peeked inside the van, which had keys hanging in the door, they saw the bundles of mail - all unopened.
An investigation is under way by the U.S. Postal investigation division.
The mail will be returned to the proper recipients.
"The mail was never opened, just not delivered," said Gus Ruiz, spokesman for the Bay Valley Postal Service. "There was no breach of confidence here. No one's identity was compromised."
The most recent letters were dated 2006 and some were older, Ruiz said.
No complaints were ever made about the missed mail in the past couple of years, he said.
"We had no reason to suspect anything was wrong," Ruiz said.
The former mail carrier, a contract employee, quit working for the U.S. Postal Service in June.
It's not known what penalties, if any, he could be facing, Ruiz said.
Bonny Doon mail is delivered by a private citizen on contract rather than by an employee of the U.S. Postal Service.
Problems arose three years ago with unreliable mail service in the small Santa Cruz Mountains town. Back then, complaints were made about missing mail, wrong deliveries, late deliveries or none at all.
It's possible the undelivered mail discovered last week is related to the problems in 2005.
U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Palo Alto, helped correct the problem in 2005 by instituting daily and weekly performance reviews of contract mail carriers.
Today, Aron Jones, postmaster for the Santa Cruz Post Office, will send the 1,100 Bonny Doon residents letters to alert them of the recovered mail.
"Because this mail has never been opened, we feel that your identity was never compromised," Jones wrote. "However, if you have reason to believe checks, financial statements or credit cards may not have been delivered, you may want to follow up with your bank or credit card company."
The mail is expected to be returned to the proper recipients by next week, Ruiz said.
If there is any financial fraud discovered related to this mail, residents can call the Postal Inspection Service at 408-938-4804 or 408-938-4803.

Contact Shanna McCord at 429-2401 or smccord@santacruzsentinel.com.

Friday, October 31, 2008

Invitation to the Bonny Doon Church Craft Faire





Please be sure to attend the annual Bonny Doon Church Craft Faire on Saturday, November 8 from 10-4. See the flyer for more particulars. The first 5,000 people who mention my name will be allowed in for free, so be sure to mention my name!





























Friday, September 26, 2008

Bonny Doon Denied Its Own Fire District-Santa Cruz Sentinel Article

Bonny Doon denied its own fire district
By Shanna McCord - Sentinel staff writer

Article Launched: 09/23/2008 10:49:59 AM PDT

SANTA CRUZ - Bonny Doon will have to stick with County Fire and give up any hope of breaking away to establish its own fire district. Aspirations of many in the small Santa Cruz Mountains community were dashed Monday night when the Local Agency Formation Commission voted 4-3 to deny a proposal from some Bonny Doon residents to disconnect from County Fire and create an independent fire district financed with property taxes.
Commissioners Cliff Barrett, Bob Begun and Jim Anderson voted to support the Bonny Doon proposal while Jim Rapoza, Roger Anderson, Tony Campos and Ellen Pirie said such a move would be harmful to the entire county.
About 500 people showed up at LAFCO's public hearing, which ran until 10:30 p.m., at First Congregational Church on High Street to make their cases - 75 speakers nearly split between supporting the proposal and wanting it shot down.
In the end, commissioners sided with a LAFCO staff report that said a new fire department for Bonny Doon would jeopardize fire protection in other parts of unincorporated Santa Cruz County, causing an estimated $365,000 annual loss to the County Fire budget.
"The problem is it will come at the expense of Davenport, Corralitos or the Summit area," Pirie said. "We can't pretend that it's not the case and that it won't matter because it will matter. It will matter a lot. I just can't do it."
Bonny Doon resident and retired fire Chief Tom Scully disputed the facts presented in the LAFCO report, saying there was no basis for the $365,000 figure presented by LAFCO Executive Director Pat McCormick.
Scully, who has been working for Bonny Doon's fire fighting independence since 2006, said the area suffers from slow response times, lack of training for volunteer firefighters and poor equipment.
In addition, he said the community was hurt by Cal Fire's failure to dispatch Bonny Doon volunteer firefighters during the Martin Fire.
"This is about the small fire that could become big. It's about the child who suffers an asthma attack or the person who has a stroke," he said. "Each situation demands a life-saving emergency response, and we're willing to take the responsibility on ourselves."
Several Davenport residents said they feared their fire coverage would take a hit if the Cal Fire station on Swanton Road were forced to close in the aftermath of Bonny Doon creating its own.
"It's unconscionable any area be shorted on service," Ken Fein of Davenport said. "Someone will get service at the expense of someone else not getting service, that's not fair."
Kay Todd, a Swanton Road resident, agreed.
"A separate district is not the solution," she said. "It's wrong that we're being pitted against each other. We should find a better way."
There is no avenue to appeal LAFCO's decision.
However, Scully said he would welcome any effort by county supervisors, especially Neal Coonerty, Ellen Pirie and Tony Campos, to help Bonny Doon residents come up with an alternative solution.
"The county never offered any options for our proposal," Scully said.
"They like to ignore the issue and hope it goes away."

Contact Shanna McCord at 429-2401 or smccord@santacruzsentinel.com.

Tuesday, September 09, 2008

More on the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Takeover

Curious about what happened during the days leading up to the dramatic seizure of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by the U.S. government?

Click here for a blow by blow of the final weeks before the takeover.

Courtesy of the New York Times

Monday, September 08, 2008

Breaking News: U.S. Gov't Takes Over Mortgage Giants

Yesterday, in a dramatic turn of events, the United States government seized control of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac companies in an effort to truncate the mortgage giants' negative influence on global markets as the housing market flails.

This new plan puts the companies under a government conservatorship and replaces their management. In addition, "The plan also commits the government to provide as much as $100 billion to each company to backstop any shortfalls in capital. It enables the Treasury to ultimately buy the companies outright at little cost. It bans them from lobbying the government...." Both companies are also required to shrink their portfolios in the future, and the government intends to "buy significant amounts of their mortgage-backed securities on the open market, beginning with the purchase of $5 billion worth this month."

Stephen LaBaton and Edmund Andrews of the New York Times comment that, "[The takeover] could become one of the most expensive financial bailouts in American history, though it will not involve any immediate taxpayer loans or investments."

Click here to read the article in its entirety, including further details of the rescue plan and commentaries from presidential candidates and top investors.

Monday, August 04, 2008

Tax Credit for New Homebuyers!

As part of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (H.R. 3221), the federal government is offering tax credits of up to $7,500 to new buyers between April 9, 2008 and June 30, 2009.

That's right. If you have not owned a house within the last three years and close escrow on a house before June 30th of next year--and that's any house--the IRS will cut either this or next year's tax bill by up to $7,500! The credit is intended to "jump-start housing sales and clear out unsold real estate inventories," according to Kenneth Harney at the Washington Post.

Keep in mind, however, that this particular tax credit does require that beneficiaries pay back the credit "starting in the second tax year after purchase and continuing for up to 15 years." In this way it is, in essence, an interest free loan.

For more details on the stipulations of this new credit and to find out if you are eligible, click here.

Email me to talk about purchasing a new home, or click here to see my current listings.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Foreclosure Relief Bill Becomes Law

This week, the State Legislature enacted foreclosure reform law to address the adverse effects of high foreclosure rates in California.

The new law requires lenders to contact homeowners to explore options for avoiding foreclosure at least 30 days before filing a notice of default.

It also requires owners acquiring property through foreclosure to maintain the exterior of vacant residential properties. The new law also extends from 30 to 60 days the time for residential tenants to move out of properties that have been foreclosed upon, unless other laws apply.

These requirements will remain in effect until January 1, 2013.

The full text of Senate Bill 1137 (Perata) is available at www.leginfo.ca.gov

Highlights of the new law are as follows:
  • Contact Between Lender and Borrower: Effective on or about September 8, 2008, a lender, trustee, or authorized agent may not file a notice of default until 30 days after contacting a borrower to assess the borrower's financial situation and explore options for avoiding foreclosure. A lender must generally contact the borrower in person or by telephone, or satisfy due diligence requirements for contacting a borrower. During the initial contact, the lender must inform the borrower of the right to request a meeting with the lender within 14 days. The lender must also give the borrower the toll-free number for finding a HUD-certified housing counseling agency. A subsequent notice of default must include the lender's declaration that it has contacted the borrower, tried with due diligence to contact the borrower, or the borrower has surrendered the property. A lender who had already filed a notice of default before the enactment of this law must include a similar declaration in the notice of sale. This requirement to contact borrowers applies to loans secured by owner-occupied residences made from 2003 to 2007. Certain exemptions apply if the borrower has filed for bankruptcy, surrendered the property, or contracted with a person or entity whose primary business is advising people, who have decided to leave their homes, on how to extend the foreclosure process and avoid their contractual obligations.

  • Maintenance of Vacant Properties: Effective July 8, 2008, anyone who acquires property through foreclosure must maintain the exterior of vacant residential property. Violations of this law include permitting excessive foliage growth that diminishes the value of surrounding properties, failing to take action against trespassers or squatters, failing to take action to prevent mosquitoes from breeding in standing water, or other public nuisances. This law authorizes a governmental entity to impose a civil fine up to $1,000 per day for any violation, as long as the owner has been given notice and an opportunity to remedy the violation. A violator must be given at least 14 days to begin, and 30 days to complete, such remediation before a fine can be assessed.

  • 60-Day Notice to Terminate Tenants: Effective July 8, 2008, a tenant or subtenant in possession of a rental housing unit that has been sold through foreclosure is generally entitled to a 60-day written notice to quit, not just 30 days. However, a borrower who remains on the property after foreclosure may be served a three-day notice to terminate. This law does not affect, among other things, rent-controlled properties with just-cause evictions. Effective on or about September 8, 2008, the lender, trustee, or authorized agent posting a notice of sale must also post and mail a specified notice of a tenant's right to a 60-day eviction notice from the new owner, unless other laws apply. This requirement to notify tenants of their rights applies to loans secured by residential real property where the borrower has a different billing address than the property address.

Tuesday, July 01, 2008

New California Cell Phone Laws

Today is July 1st, which means today is also the day that California's new Cell Phone Laws go into effect.

As of today, it is illegal to use a handheld wireless telephone while operating a motor vehicle. Motorists who are 18 and older may use a "hands-free device"--a Bluetooth or other earpiece--but those motorists who are younger than 18 may not use a handheld phone or a hands-free device at all.


For more detailed information about the new law and answers to Frequently Asked Questions, click here.

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

FIRE PROTECTION: What You Need to Know

It has been a busy start to the fire season in California. In many of the fires where we have seen homes destroyed, there has been a lack of defensible space around the homes. This is the area within the perimeter of a parcel where brush clearance, emergency access, and other wildfire prevention measures must be maintained.


Recent changes in state law require that homeowners in certain high fire risk areas maintain defensible space clearance out to 100 feet from their home, expanded from the 30-foot firebreak that was already required.Even if you are not in a high fire risk area, it’s a good idea to create enough defensible space around your property to decrease the risk of fire.

Here is a link to the brochure of the CDF's guidelines for creating defensible space: http://fire.ca.gov/cdfbofdb/PDFS/4291finalguidelines2_23_06.pdf

For more information, the CDF website is http://www.fire.ca.gov/

Dump the Junk: Another Tip on Stopping Junk Mail

Did you know that the average household receives 1.5 trees' worth of junk mail annually?

If you've ever wondered, as you tossed the unsolicited catalogs and direct mail materials directly into the recycling bin, if there is a way to stop this waste of paper, fuel, printing, etc., there is!

Simply log on to https://www.directmail.com/directory/mail_preference/ and opt out of direct mail lists at no cost.

Tuesday, June 03, 2008

Upcoming Event: Bonny Doon Art & Wine Festival

This Saturday, June 7th, the Bonny Doon Community School Foundation is hosting the

6th Annual Bonny Doon Art & Wine Festival
from 1PM to 5PM
at the Bonny Doon Airport Gardens!

The Bonny Doon Community School Foundation (BDCSF) is hosting the 6th Annual Art and Wine Festival on Saturday, June 7th, from 1PM to 5PM. It will be held at the beautiful Bonny Doon Airport Gardens with over 20 wine tasting tables and over 40 auction items and demonstrations. A tasty array of gourmet treats and local musicians will also be adding to the fun festivities under the redwoods. Art works by featured artist Barbara Bailey-Porter and a beautiful collection of local artists' quality fine arts and crafts will be available for sale.

BDCSF holds this annual fundraiser to support programs at Bonny Doon Elementary such as music, art, assemblies, teacher training, developing a model science lab/classroom for the K-6 students, and growing the funds in our endowment.

Tickets are $25.00 in advance or $35.00 at the gate. Call for tickets and more information at 831-423-7728 or visit www.bonny-doon.info.

This year, the BDCSF has a goal of growing the endowment to $100,000. This is the largest event contributing to that goal, so mark your calendar!

Monday, May 05, 2008

The State of the Market: Not as Bad as You'd Expect?

According to Market Watch,

"Top officials with the National Association of Realtors and Standard & Poor's, which issues the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index, agreed this week their monthly reports are giving imprecise readings of price changes at all levels -- national, state and regional -- due to rare market conditions that are skewing survey results."
These "rare market conditions" include an anomalous trend in which sales of more expensive homes are dropping do to tighter lending restrictions and sales of less costly homes are spiking due to increased foreclosures. These phenomena combine to dramatically lower the national median home cost.
In addition, the S&P/Case-Shiller index tracks just 20 major markets in the country, making its data less than representative; and, the fact that the index has only been around since 2001 is good to keep in mind to keep some perspective when it issues reports using language such as "plunged by a record" and "fastest rate ever."
In the end, Chris Plummer reports that, according to the NAR's Chief Economist Lawrence Yun, "pockets of severe price declines in local markets are skewing figures. If homeowners want to determine their property's value, it's never been more critical to take the measure of recent sales by home-price level in their town or city neighborhood."
For a free report to determine the value of your home based on local market conditions, contact me directly at frank@frankmurphy.net or 831-457-5550.
To read the article in its entirety, click here.

Monday, April 28, 2008

Fed Rate Cut Predicted

The monetary policy meeting of the Federal Reserve is just two days away, and many predict that the institution is likely to cut the short-term interest rate once again, from 2.25%to 2%.

This would be the seventh time that the rate has been lowered since August, and would signal that a recession is still a strong possibility this year.

Although the stock market is doing relatively well at the moment, soaring prices for oil and food have fostered a growing fear of imminent recession.

In addition, as Steven Weisman of the New York Times reminds us, "A tricky aspect of the Fed’s decision is that the impact of whatever it does may not be felt for more than six months. Many economists say it takes at least that long for interest rate cuts to have an economic effect."

In the end, one major issue that the Fed will battle over is the need to take care of inflation versus the need to ward of a recession.

Click here to read Weisman's article in its entirety.

Wednesday, April 09, 2008

FYI: Request for Reappraisal in Santa Cruz County

Santa Cruz Association of REALTORS®
Email Ed
Week of April 7, 2008

REQUEST FOR REAPPRAISAL OF HOME IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY


When the taxpayer in Santa Cruz County believes he/she is being over assessed this form may be submitted to the Assessor's Office so that the current assessed values may be reviewed. For more information see the County’s brochure entitled Prop 8 Reductions under Tax Cycle Information.

Note: If you are unable to open the link to the Request for Reappraisal form simply copy and paste the link below into your browser.

http://sccounty01.co.santa-cruz.ca.us/asr/forms/taxform10.pdf

Friday, February 29, 2008

The Secrets to Real Estate Success

The Santa Cruz Sentinel published an article today featuring the testimonies of Santa Cruz's most successful Realtors.

Frank's secret? "I love helping people."


by Jondi Gumz, Santa Cruz Sentinel

Homebuyers are scarce. Sales are down 50 percent compared to the peak of 2005.Yet some real estate agents closed a deal a month -- or more -- last year, the slowest year of the past decade. How did they do it?

About 90 people showed up Wednesday at a luncheon organized by the local chapter of the Women's Council of Realtors to hear six top agents share their secrets.

Quipped moderator Robert Bailey, president of Bailey Properties, "This could be the new cast of 'Survivor.' "

When Sally Bookman started in real estate in 1974, she made it a habit to write notes to the prospective buyers she met at open houses. She didn't procrastinate; she started writing notes before the open house ended. Now she has a huge referral business.

Bookman, originally from London, bought a house while studying at UC Berkeley. She filled the house with students, then bought the lot next door, and then another house.

"I never lost at Monopoly," she said.

She said she uses her doctorate in social anthropology to figure out what clients want."If you drive that car and the way you dress, I know what kind of house you want," she said.

Frank Murphy made only one deal in 1998, his first year in real estate. He had expected his new career would mean lots of free time, but he worked 70-80 hours a week.

He uses his 15 years of experience as a building contractor to help buyers solve problems.

"I love helping people," he said.


Audrey Tennant, who's been in the business for 20 years, stays in touch with clients. She uses seasonal marketing campaigns. Working in human resources and marketing for a food and wine company over the hill, she learned patience during union negotiations.

Real estate, she said, is "a give and take business not a push and shove business."

Michael O'Boy initially didn't want to follow in the footsteps of his dad, who was a broker. He became a therapist instead. Then he traded that profession for real estate in 1995 when he decided he wanted to become a homeowner. He found his background as a therapist helpful."You listen more and say less," he said.

Lela Willet taught kindergarten until she had a second child. Then she left the classroom to work with her husband, a builder. She sets aside time once a week to call every one of her clients. She does it away from the office, so she doesn't get interrupted.

Being with 5-year-olds, she learned patience and listening, valuable skills in real estate.Pat Simmons made connections in construction working as a masonry contractor with his father."I can recommend folks I would use," he said.

He also can advise clients how much to offer when they tell him the kitchen has to be updated. One lesson he learned from his father: Ask yourself: "Are you proud to put your name on your work?" Ask that question every day.

So what do they all have in common?

It's not high-tech gadgets.

In fact, only Murphy and O'Boy like technology. All of the others outsource computer tasks.Experience counts, certainly, but that's not enough by itself.

For each of these agents, the key is helping people. It's finding out what their clients need and helping them get what they need.

As Simmons put it, "It's about success for the client, not you and the commission."

Well said.


Lessons from survivors

Audrey Tennant
Firm: David Lyng Real Estate
'07 escrows: 14
Started in: 1987
Was in: Human resources/marketing
Relaxes by: Spending time with grandchildren.
Quote: Look for opportunities. Remember buyers turn into sellers.

Frank Murphy
Firm: Keller Williams Realty
'07 Escrows: 19
Started in: 1998
Was: Building contractor
Relaxes by: Traveling
Quote: Instead of trying to make a buck, I have an opportunity to help people solve a problem.

Mike O'Boy
Firm: Coldwell Banker
'07 Escrows: 25
Started in: 1995
Was: Therapist at Dominican Hospital
Relaxes by: Coaching
Quote: Don't take for granted where your business will come from. An open house three years ago could result in a client. Return every phone call.

Monday, February 04, 2008

Proposal to Increase Lending Limits: What Do You Think?

Designed to "jump-start the ailing U.S. housing market," the current federal economic stimulus plan includes a proposal to increase the size limit on loans from mortgage financiers such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. At the moment, the limit is set at $417,000. With this proposal, the loan limit would go up to $729,750.

According to this post at TheTruthAboutMortgage.com, "the hope is that the easing of the loan limits will allow homeowners in more expensive housing markets to obtain more favorable financing, which in turn should promote sales and uphold home prices."

However, not everyone is quite so optimistic. This article by Al Yoon of Reuters gives a more cynical view than the opinion over at TheTruthAboutMortgage. Yoon fears that raising the loan limit might unintentionally raise mortgage rates, since "increasing the eligible loans to $729,750 from $417,000 would change the characteristics of mortgage-backed securities, leading traders to exact a premium for increased interest-rate risk." Higher mortgage rates would in turn, of course, "make it even harder to unload already high housing inventories and existing homes on the market, delaying any housing recovery and potentially extending the U.S. economic slowdown."

We're curious what you think about the economic stimulus proposal and its hope to increase loan limits . Go ahead and read both articles (click on the links provided) and let us know your prediction!

How the New Rate Cuts Might Affect Your Mortgage

As most of us know, last Wednesday marked another .5% rate cut for the Federal Reserve, placing the current interest rate at a flat 3%.

Alan Heavens of the Chicago Tribune has written an insightful article about the way that short-term interest rate cuts affect the public's perception of mortgage rate. Click here to read about the rush for refinancing in the wake of the most recent rate cuts.

Monday, January 14, 2008

The Santa Cruz County Housing Market in 2008

Will Santa Cruz County succeed in "bucking the statewide housing trend"?

According to Sentinel staff writer Jondi Gumz, some say it can:

"Santa Cruz County is expected to bypass the statewide housing trends in 2008.

Alan Nevin, economist for the California Building Industry Association, said his statewide prediction for smaller homes and lower prices might come true in San Luis Obispo but not in Santa Cruz.

'The problem in Santa Cruz is supply,' said Jeff Becker of DMB Associates in Hollister and association chairman. 'You're not going to see smaller homes there at lower prices. Builders can build larger and always have a buyer.'

The CBIA forecasts 2,200 housing starts in the Central Coast area, which runs from Santa Cruz to Santa Barbara counties. From 2002 to 2005, an average of 4,581 single-family homes got permits; the number dropped to 2,000 in 2007. Multifamily homes, often less than 1,000 units, are not a significant factor.

Between 2,000 and 3,000 new jobs are projected in 2008, a slight improvement over 2007, but down from 7,000 in 2005.

Here's what locals expect:

Jeff Talmadge, Aptos builder: 'I think pricing from trade contractors will be lower this year than last year. I have had some of them tell me they will be more aggressive about going after more types of work than in the past. There have been more instances of contractors who are based over the hill competing for jobs here in Santa Cruz than I have ever seen before. From an environmentalist's standpoint, I like to see homes heading toward being smaller.'

Dennis Norton, Capitola land-use planner: 'Nothing new is coming down the pike. I think it's going to be a slow year. The business in Santa Cruz is remodeling; compared to new homes, the ratio is 10 to 1 or 6 to 1. The only people building are on the high end, people who aren't affected by the economy. A third of my clients are like that. They're from over the hill. One paid $2.7 million for property in Pleasure Point, tore down the house and will probably spend $2 million to build. As for smaller houses, I don't see that. That may be true in the spec business but nobody is in the spec business now. Maybe the condos under construction on 41st Avenue. They just started framing on that project.'"

Friday, January 11, 2008

B of A Set to Buy Countrywide

Bank of America Corp officially announced today that it will buy mortgage lender Countrywide Financial Corp for $4 billion dollars.

According to Reuters, "Countrywide's market value has slid by about $22 billion in the last year." Caught in the subprime mess up until now, hopes are that the merger will "avert one of the biggest collapses in the U.S. housing crisis."

Bank of America and Countrywide will combine to create the nation's second-biggest mortgage lender.


Bank Of America to Buy Countrywide For $4 Billion, from Reuters via the New York Times

Thursday, January 03, 2008

Press Release: Frank Murphy - Expertise in Luxury Home Market

Frank Murphy with Keller Williams Realty Luxury Homes Division of Santa Cruz recently completed a luxury home marketing training course offered by the Miami Board of Realtors.

The course - which covered such topics as demographics of the affluent, lifestyle segmentation, trends and amenities in today’s luxury home product, and creating a marketing plan for the multimillion dollar property – was taught by Laurie Moore-Moore, President of the Dallas-based Institute and author of the book, “Rich Buyer, Rich Seller! The Real Estate Agents’ Guide to Marketing Luxury Homes.”

“The course is a step towards earning the prestigious Certified Luxury Home Marketing Specialist designation which The Institute awards internationally to sales professionals who meet performance standards in the upper-tier residential market,” said Moore-Moore. Frank Murphy is an example of a sales associate who works to hone the special skills and competencies necessary to provide exceptional service in the fine homes and estates marketplace.”

Frank Murphy is an award-winning sales associate who has been in real estate since 1997 and specializes in the Santa Cruz County market. Frank is currently one of the 25 Top Producing Realtors in Santa Cruz County.

“The training provided new insight about the upper tier market, helped me polish my skills, and provided valuable networking contacts with other agents across the country who specialize in luxury properties,” said Murphy “In addition, I discovered new and creative tools for promoting expensive homes and estates and new resources for finding buyer prospects. Home buyers and sellers will benefit from my new knowledge.”

For current information on the upper tier market, contact Frank Murphy at Keller Williams Realty Luxury Homes Division of Santa Cruz at 831-457-5550 or email Frank@FrankMurphy.net

www.frankmurphy.net